Project:Requests for comment - Revision history

Harej: ce

2023-07-11T02:57:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 11 July 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hypothetically, a '''request for comment''' would occur when informal [[Project:Consensus\|consensus]]-gathering fails to yield a satisfactory outcome and a more formal decision-making process is necessary (i.e. a decision can't be deferred indefinitely).		Hypothetically, a '''request for comment''' would occur when informal [[Project:Consensus\|consensus]]-gathering fails to yield a satisfactory outcome and a more formal decision-making process is necessary (i.e. a decision can't be deferred indefinitely).

	One of the [[Project:Principles\|principles]] of Librarybase is that "Librarybase should be governed by clear processes accessible to all users." This means that, for a valid request for comment to take place, there first must be [[Project:Consensus\|consensus]] on what the ~~valid~~ process ~~would~~ be. Agreeing on a process before the occurrence of a dispute ensures that the creation of the process does not itself get tied up in the dispute.		One of the [[Project:Principles\|principles]] of Librarybase is that "Librarybase should be governed by clear processes accessible to all users." This means that, for a valid request for comment to take place, there first must be [[Project:Consensus\|consensus]] on what the process should be. Agreeing on a process before the occurrence of a dispute ensures that the creation of the process does not itself get tied up in the dispute.

Harej: ce.

2023-07-11T02:57:11Z

ce.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 11 July 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hypothetically, a '''request for comment''' would occur when informal [[Project:Consensus\|consensus]]-gathering fails to yield a satisfactory outcome and a more formal decision-making process is necessary (i.e. a decision can't be deferred indefinitely).		Hypothetically, a '''request for comment''' would occur when informal [[Project:Consensus\|consensus]]-gathering fails to yield a satisfactory outcome and a more formal decision-making process is necessary (i.e. a decision can't be deferred indefinitely).

	One of the [[Project:Principles\|principles]] of Librarybase is that "Librarybase should be governed by clear processes accessible to all users." This means that, for a valid request for comment to take place, there first must be ~~an agreed-upon process for doing so. Therefore, we first would have to decide~~ [[Project:Consensus\|by consensus]] what ~~our~~ process ~~for holding RFCs is~~. ~~This way,~~ the process ~~is ultimately derived from community consensus~~.		One of the [[Project:Principles\|principles]] of Librarybase is that "Librarybase should be governed by clear processes accessible to all users." This means that, for a valid request for comment to take place, there first must be [[Project:Consensus\|consensus]] on what the valid process would be. Agreeing on a process before the occurrence of a dispute ensures that the creation of the process does not itself get tied up in the dispute.

Harej: Created page with "Hypothetically, a '''request for comment''' would occur when informal consensus-gathering fails to yield a satisfactory outcome and a more formal decision-making process is necessary (i.e. a decision can't be deferred indefinitely). One of the principles of Librarybase is that "Librarybase should be governed by clear processes accessible to all users." This means that, for a valid request for comment to take place, there firs..."

2023-07-11T02:54:50Z

Created page with "Hypothetically, a '''request for comment''' would occur when informal consensus-gathering fails to yield a satisfactory outcome and a more formal decision-making process is necessary (i.e. a decision can't be deferred indefinitely). One of the principles of Librarybase is that "Librarybase should be governed by clear processes accessible to all users." This means that, for a valid request for comment to take place, there firs..."

New page

Hypothetically, a '''request for comment''' would occur when informal [[Project:Consensus|consensus]]-gathering fails to yield a satisfactory outcome and a more formal decision-making process is necessary (i.e. a decision can't be deferred indefinitely).

One of the [[Project:Principles|principles]] of Librarybase is that "Librarybase should be governed by clear processes accessible to all users." This means that, for a valid request for comment to take place, there first must be an agreed-upon process for doing so. Therefore, we first would have to decide [[Project:Consensus|by consensus]] what our process for holding RFCs is. This way, the process is ultimately derived from community consensus.